Donbas: A new 'black hole' in Europe

Larceny, human rights abuses, and war damage in east Ukraine point to the creation of a new “black hole” in Europe.

When Russia’s ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, briefed press in Brussels this week in the run-up to Russia’s 9 May WWII memorial, he didn’t rule out escalation.

He blamed Ukraine’s volunteer battalions for “intensified fighting” near Donetsk airport, saying “there are indeed different rumours, including of possible offensive operations by the Ukrainian army”.

His words fit the pattern of the past 16 months: Russian claims of ceasefire violations followed by military action.

But most EU diplomats believe Moscow’s interests will be better served by the status quo.

“[Russian leader] Putin i wants to keep the conflict simmering at a certain temperature, giving him the option to activate it at any moment which suits him”, one EU contact said.

He already has simmering conflicts centred round de facto states in Moldova, Georgia, and Azerbaijan.

Some of the entities, notably Transniestria in Moldova and South Ossetia in Georgia, are havens for organised crime. Transniestria, for instance, makes counterfeit medicines on an industrial scale.

The Donbas region in east Ukraine now hosts the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) and Luhansk People’s Republic (LPR).

The DPR and LPR leadership is a hotch-potch of people who keep changing posts, arresting each other, and coming and going across the open border with Russia.

It includes local pro-Russia sympathisers; shady businessmen with Russian interests; Russian intelligence officers; and Chechen or Cossack militiamen and mercenaries.

The war has caused devastation.

One million people have fled. Those who stayed have no pensions or social security.

Donetsk airport, a showpiece built for the Euro2012 football tournament, is in ruins. Roads, bridges, railway lines, and energy infrastructure have been destroyed. Coal mines are filling with water for lack of electricity to operate pumps.

“It’ll take a lot of money, and time, to rebuild things”, Anatoliy Kinakh, a former Ukrainian PM who now chairs the Ukrainian League of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, its main business lobby, told EUobserver.

But the new masters aren’t making things better.

Denys Kazanskyi, a journalist and blogger from Donetsk who now lives in Kiev, told this website that “the LPR and DPR authorities are looting everything, even cars, office equipment, and taking it to Russia. In future, it will be poor, like Transniestria”.

The lawlessness also has a more sinister side.

“It’s not Russian territory. It’s not Ukraine. It’s a black hole on the map. People can disappear. You can be shot on the street because there’s no law and order”, Kazanskyi adeed.

Mariya Tomak, who works for Centre of Civil Liberties, a Kiev-based NGO, estimates that 1,500 people have vanished in the region since fighting began.

She says documents found by Ukrainian soldiers in some ex-DPR and LPR facilities indicate they practice “torture” and “extra-judicial executions”.

She added that people are afraid to criticise authorities, even in phonecalls to friends or relatives, because “they think the FSB [Russia’s main intelligence service] is listening”.

The other side

The situation is different on the other side of the contact line.

It’s far from normal.

Tomak noted that Ukraine’s volunteer battalions are also guilty of human rights abuses, albeit “on a completely different scale” to LPR and DPR.

Olena Halushka, from Reanimation Package of Reforms, another a Kiev-based NGO, said there’s resistance to reform, especially in law enforcement and judicial structures.

“Politicians are using the war and the devaluation of the hryvnia [Ukraine’s currency] as an excuse to postpone, postpone”, she told EUobserver.

Tomak also said lack of an EU enlargement promise and some EU states’ pro-Russia views have harmed pro-EU sentiment. “During the past year, what the EU means [to Ukrainians] has become much more realistic, less romantic”.

Halushka and Tomak said there’s still great appetite for change in Ukrainian society, however.

There's also optimism in Ukraine’s business community.

Kinakh, the industrialists’ chairman, said the entry into force, on 1 January, of the EU free trade treaty, will lead to “rule of law, modernisation of the economy”.

“For us, the EU is much more than just a market for Ukrainian goods. It’s also a source of high technology and private investment.”

He predicts exports to the EU will go up in the agricultural sector (corn, wheat, rape, sunflower oil, and poultry), in machine parts for aviation and ship-building, in pharmaceuticals, and in IT services.

When EU leaders meet with counterparts of six former Soviet states, including Ukraine, in Riga on 21 May, they won’t say anything on enlargement.

But for Kinakh “it won’t be a negative signal for investors”.

“The number one signal is predictability of doing business in Ukraine, protection of property rights, a level playing field, absence of corruption”.

Low hryvnia

He noted the low hryvnia means “now’s the time” for foreign firms to buy Ukrainian assets.

For Kinakh, it doesn’t matter if, say, a US venture capitalist, buys a Ukrainian factory for $1: “The price is of secondary importance. The most important thing is that they bring modernisation, make Ukrainian firms more competitive, and create jobs”.

It’s a message that isn’t being lost on the outside world.

EUobserver spoke with a former US State Department official who gave up his post to join a company intending to buy assets in Ukraine’s electricity production and transmission sector.

It also spoke with an Israeli businessman, in the metals sector, who has registered three new Ukraine trading firms.

The Israeli contact, who asked not to be named, said business people don’t care about EU silence on Ukraine accession: “It might take five years or 10 years, not 20 years. But Ukraine is heading into the European Union”.

Despite the EU-realism, some Ukrainians feel the same way.

“We’ve burnt our bridges with Russia, so there’s nowhere for us to go except the West”, Kazanskyi, the Donetsk blogger, noted.

Reconciliation

Tomak, from the Centre of Civil Liberties, said future reconciliation with DPR and LPR “won’t be easy”, not least due to Russian media, which has a monopoly in the region and which is propagating hatred of Ukrainian “neo-Nazis”.

But reconciliation will be easier if the rest of Ukraine becomes a decent place to live.

“For us, it’s very important that people in the occupied regions can see that we have a good standard of life, protection of human rights, and a better economic situation”, Kinakh said.

“The success of the reforms is no less important than military success in protecting the territorial integrity of our country”.