Europarlement hevig teleurgesteld over vonnis Pussy Riot (en)

Met dank overgenomen van Europees Parlement (EP) i, gepubliceerd op donderdag 13 september 2012.

The human rights situation in Russia has deteriorated drastically in the last few months, with the adoption of a series of laws that could be used to further restrict opposition and hinder freedom of expression, says Parliament in a resolution adopted on Thursday. MEPs cite the cases of the punk band Pussy Riot and the opposition party member Gennady Gudkov as examples.

They are gravely concerned about "the deteriorating climate" for the development of civil society in Russia, pointing to the recent legislation on demonstrations, NGOs, defamation and the Internet.

"Disproportionate sentence" against Pussy Riot

Parliament is "deeply disappointed with the verdict and the disproportionate sentence" against the punk band Pussy Riot, describing it as "politically motivated intimidation of opposition activists". It hopes the sentence will be reviewed and reversed in line with Russia’s international commitments. .

Pussy Riot is one of the eight candidates nominated on Thursday for the 2012 Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought.

Examples of abuse of power

The resolution cites the case of Sergei Magnitsky as just one of several examples of abuse of power by the Russian law enforcement authorities.

MEPs also note that the steps taken to strip Gennady Gudkov, a member of the opposition Just Russia party, of his parliamentary mandate are widely seen as intimidation and call on Russia to "refrain from using laws arbitrarily for the purpose of clamping down on members of the opposition".

New NGO legislation

The resolution highlights the "growing pressure on the political freedoms of Russian citizens", mentioning that legislation on NGOs and on the right to freedom of assembly could be used to suppress civil society, stifle opposing political views and harass NGOs, democratic opposition and the media.

Parliament also fears that the law on extremism could lead to arbitrariness and restriction of the freedoms of association, expression and belief.

Procedure: Non-legislative resolution