Handelsovereenkomst met ACS-landen (en)

Met dank overgenomen van Europees Parlement (EP) i, gepubliceerd op dinsdag 9 december 2008.

Whether or not they sign economic partnership agreements (EPAs) with the EU, the countries of Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP) should not be worse off than under the current system of preferences, says a report adopted by Parliament’s Development Committee on Monday. Flanking measures in the form of aid for trade should be used to help the ACP countries, for example to offset any loss of customs revenue.

The report, drafted by Jürgen Schroeder (EPP-ED, DE), urges the Council and Commission to accept any goods-only WTO-compatible proposals from ACP countries. The compatibility of the EPAs with WTO rules (GATT Article XXIV) pertains only to trade in goods and requires a “substantial part of the trade” to be liberalized “within a reasonable length of time”, says the report.

The Lomé accords between the European Community and the ACP countries included trade preferences for the ACP countries which were more favourable than those granted by the EU to other developing countries under the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP).  This special regime, which has been challenged by the non-ACP developing countries, was temporarily extended by a derogation from the World Trade Organisation (WTO) which expired on 31 December 2007.

MEPs remind the Council and Commission that neither the conclusion nor the renunciation of an EPA should lead to a situation where an ACP country may find itself in a less favourable position than it was under the trade provisions of the Cotonou Agreement.

Aid for trade

Only strong accompanying measures will enable the ACP countries to benefit from the opportunities available under EPAs.  Such measures must offset any net loss in customs revenue and be invested in order to diversify export production and produce more higher addedvalue export goods, says the Development Committee’s report.

Review clause and regional integration

EPA agreements should include a clause requiring a review within five years of the date they are signed. National parliaments, the European Parliament and civil society should be involved, according to the report.  This five year period should allow an assessment of the impact of the EPAs on the economies of the ACP states and on the ability of these agreements to strengthen regional integration. A revision of the content of these agreements should be possible. 

To prevent EPAs concluded with individual ACP countries or with groups of countries that do not cover an entire region from hindering the regional integration process, MEPs call on the Commission to redefine its approach and ensure that the conclusion of EPAs does not undermine this process.

Of the 15 countries of the Pacific region (including East Timor), where the 16th session of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly was held from 24 to 28 November 2008 (in Port Moresby, Papua-New Guinea), only Papua and Fiji have signed provisional agreements. The erosion of trade preferences - sugar for Fiji and tuna for Papua-New Guinea - prompted these countries to sign a provisional accord in November 2007.

Parliamentary scrutiny of the implementation of EPAs

The implementation of the EPAs should be monitored by a parliamentary body, says the report.  In each case, this body should derive from the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly.

Parliament’s assent

The European Parliament will have to give formal approval (known as its “assent”), probably in spring 2009, to enable these agreements to enter into force.  Since the accords have a significant trade component, this procedure will be the responsibility of the EP’s International Trade Committee.

The negotiations with ACP states were opened in 2002, following the adoption by the Council of the negotiating brief on 12 June 2002.  The negotiations are being conducted with six regions (Caribbean, West Africa, Central Africa, Eastern and Southern Africa, Southern African Development Community, Pacific).

The report was adopted by 15 votes to 13. Plenary vote: February 2009

08/12/2008

In the chair : Josep BORRELL FONTELLES (PES, ES)